Grand Courtroom of Justice

Judging the Judges

Judging the Judges

October 2, 2026

Judging the Judges

By: Lauren Scribner

Judges are in the business of holding people accountable for crimes and misconduct—but how do we hold judges accountable for their own ethical lapses? Recently, in a moment of frustration, Florida Second Circuit Judge J. Layne Smith told three attorneys practicing in his courtroom that he “would like to tell the deputy to pull his gun and shoot all three of [them] as far as [his] level of frustration right now.”[1] Yes—you read that correctly. A presiding judge vocalized his thought to have attorneys practicing in his courtroom shot by courtroom security. What should the consequence be for using such threatening language? A mere public reprimand and recusal from that case?[2] Or, should there be some sort of tangible punishment?…

Read More about Judging the Judges

Dismissive of Dismissal

September 25, 2026

Dismissive of Dismissal

By: James Trusty

During the two Trump administrations, a trend has begun to emerge of federal judges challenging the once-unrestricted authority of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to dismiss indictments. The longstanding framework of separation of powers suggests this judicial pushback is unsupported activism, but the judges claim the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (“Rules”) do not relegate their role to rubber stamping. Ultimately, this trajectory may lead…

Read More about Dismissive of Dismissal

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

August 18, 2026

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

By: Robert Ward

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally. Any attorney who has litigated a case against a party proceeding pro se is familiar with the common refrain that courts liberally construe pro se filings.[1] This leniency was not enough for one Connecticut litigant. In a scheme that gives new meaning to the phrase “reading between the lines,” pro se plaintiff Matthew Elliot…

Read More about In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

True Threats and True Agendas

July 6, 2023

True Threats and True Agendas

By: James Trusty

Last week’s Supreme Court opinion on the “true threats” doctrine seemingly settles a long- brewing issue in threat-based prosecutions but also reflects the anticipatory positioning of various Associate Justices on much hotter issues that may make their way to SCOTUS consideration in the near future. As such, the debate-behind-the-debate between the Court’s members is of great interest to those who like predicting the next big…

Read More about True Threats and True Agendas

Robocop Finds His Man, But Man Gets Robocop’s Instruction Manual

June 22, 2023

Robocop Finds His Man, But Man Gets Robocop’s Instruction Manual

By: James Trusty

Many years ago, a prosecutor I worked with at the time was in a fascinating murder trial, where the defense included a forensic psychiatrist opining that the defendant suffered from multiple personalities. According to this expert, one of the “inhabitants” of the defendant’s mind was a creature named Tofu the Demon Dog. On cross examination, the doctor volunteered to the jury that these distinct personalities…

Read More about Robocop Finds His Man, But Man Gets Robocop’s Instruction Manual

Singing the Varsity Blues – Convictions Vacated For Two Defendants in the College Admission Scandal.

June 19, 2023

Singing the Varsity Blues – Convictions Vacated For Two Defendants in the College Admission Scandal.

By: Abbey Block

On May 10, 2023, the First Circuit Court of Appeals provided welcoming news to two of the defendants in “Varsity Blues” the college admissions scandal – their convictions were being vacated. Former Wynn Resorts executive Gamal Abdelaziz and private equity executive John Wilson were just two of dozens of high-profile defendants charged with various white-collar crimes – including bribery and fraud – for making fraudulent…

Read More about Singing the Varsity Blues – Convictions Vacated For Two Defendants in the College Admission Scandal.

Playing with House Money

May 15, 2023

Playing with House Money

By: James Trusty

Just as the walls seemed to be closing in on young entrepreneur Charlie Javice, a bit of offense has left her opponent, JPMorgan, in an entirely uncomfortable position largely of its own making. Javice founded a college loan planning entity called Frank, that appeared to be doing so well that JP Morgan bought it in 2021 for $175 million, purportedly lining Charlie’s pocket to the…

Read More about Playing with House Money

Eight Finance Social Media Influencers Charged In $100 Million Market Manipulation Scheme

December 19, 2022

Eight Finance Social Media Influencers Charged In $100 Million Market Manipulation Scheme

By: Jake Gray

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has announced charges against eight finance-oriented social media influencers in an alleged $100 million securities fraud scheme, in which they engaged in “pump-and-dump” market manipulation by leveraging their following on various social media platforms. The securities fraud charges, unsealed on December 13th, name seven defendants with an eighth defendant charged with aiding and abetting the alleged scheme. [1]…

Read More about Eight Finance Social Media Influencers Charged In $100 Million Market Manipulation Scheme

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Judging the Judges

Judging the Judges
By: Lauren Scribner

Dismissive of Dismissal

Dismissive of Dismissal
By: James Trusty

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.
By: Robert Ward

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights