Grand Courtroom of Justice

Judging the Judges

Judging the Judges

October 2, 2026

Judging the Judges

By: Lauren Scribner

Judges are in the business of holding people accountable for crimes and misconduct—but how do we hold judges accountable for their own ethical lapses? Recently, in a moment of frustration, Florida Second Circuit Judge J. Layne Smith told three attorneys practicing in his courtroom that he “would like to tell the deputy to pull his gun and shoot all three of [them] as far as [his] level of frustration right now.”[1] Yes—you read that correctly. A presiding judge vocalized his thought to have attorneys practicing in his courtroom shot by courtroom security. What should the consequence be for using such threatening language? A mere public reprimand and recusal from that case?[2] Or, should there be some sort of tangible punishment?…

Read More about Judging the Judges

Dismissive of Dismissal

September 25, 2026

Dismissive of Dismissal

By: James Trusty

During the two Trump administrations, a trend has begun to emerge of federal judges challenging the once-unrestricted authority of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to dismiss indictments. The longstanding framework of separation of powers suggests this judicial pushback is unsupported activism, but the judges claim the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (“Rules”) do not relegate their role to rubber stamping. Ultimately, this trajectory may lead…

Read More about Dismissive of Dismissal

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

August 18, 2026

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

By: Robert Ward

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally. Any attorney who has litigated a case against a party proceeding pro se is familiar with the common refrain that courts liberally construe pro se filings.[1] This leniency was not enough for one Connecticut litigant. In a scheme that gives new meaning to the phrase “reading between the lines,” pro se plaintiff Matthew Elliot…

Read More about In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

After Legislature Acts, Delaware Ready to Become 2nd State to Legalize Online Gaming

June 29, 2012

After Legislature Acts, Delaware Ready to Become 2nd State to Legalize Online Gaming

By: Ifrah Law

Delaware is now poised to become the second state to legalize online gaming. On Wednesday, that state’s Senate passed a bill that would legalize web table games, including poker, video lottery games, and traditional lottery games to be offered online. Democratic Governor Jack Markell supports the bill and is expected to sign it into law soon. Earlier in the month the bill passed the state’s…

Read More about After Legislature Acts, Delaware Ready to Become 2nd State to Legalize Online Gaming

Appellate Court Casts Doubt on Acceptability of ‘Obey-the Law’ Injunctions

June 25, 2012

Appellate Court Casts Doubt on Acceptability of ‘Obey-the Law’ Injunctions

By: Jeff Ifrah

We recently blogged about the recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Goble, 2012 WL 1918819 (11th Cir. May 29, 2012).  There, we discussed the appeals court’s limitation on the reach of the concept of “securities fraud” under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b(5). Another aspect of that case is also…

Read More about Appellate Court Casts Doubt on Acceptability of ‘Obey-the Law’ Injunctions

FBI Raid Targets For-Profit School in Florida: Was This Necessary?

June 18, 2012

FBI Raid Targets For-Profit School in Florida: Was This Necessary?

By: Nicole Kardell

When you hear of FBI agents descending upon a place, you might think of a hostage situation, a drug raid, or the penetration of a terrorist cell. But you probably wouldn’t assume that those armed agents were working with the U.S. Department of Education on a raid on a Florida for-profit college. FBI agents raided campuses of FastTrain College in May 2012 in order to…

Read More about FBI Raid Targets For-Profit School in Florida: Was This Necessary?

DOJ’s Response to Grassley Gives Details, but Not the Right Details

June 4, 2012

DOJ’s Response to Grassley Gives Details, but Not the Right Details

By: Nicole Kardell

The Justice Department showed off some fancy dance moves in a recent sidestep it used to respond to an inquiry from Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). Grassley wanted detail from Justice to support its claims that it has brought thousands of mortgage fraud cases, including numerous convictions against Wall Street execs, following the 2008 housing crisis. Justice provided detail . . . but not detail responsive…

Read More about DOJ’s Response to Grassley Gives Details, but Not the Right Details

Abbott’s $1.6 Billion Pharmacy Law Settlement Stands as Cautionary Tale to Pharma Companies

May 29, 2012

Abbott’s $1.6 Billion Pharmacy Law Settlement Stands as Cautionary Tale to Pharma Companies

By: Ifrah Law

A recent settlement by global pharmaceutical giant Abbott Laboratories over its promotion of the drug Depakote shows that federal regulators remain prepared to pursue drug manufacturers for promoting unapproved uses of their products. Abbott has agreed to pay federal and state governments a total of $1.6 billion in criminal and civil fines and to plead guilty to a criminal misdemeanor violation of the Food and…

Read More about Abbott’s $1.6 Billion Pharmacy Law Settlement Stands as Cautionary Tale to Pharma Companies

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Judging the Judges

Judging the Judges
By: Lauren Scribner

Dismissive of Dismissal

Dismissive of Dismissal
By: James Trusty

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.
By: Robert Ward

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights