Facade of the United States Suprement Court in Washington, DC

Supremely Improbable

Supremely Improbable

July 30, 2024

Supremely Improbable

By: James Trusty

President Biden’s pronounced objectives for Supreme Court “reform” are improbable, politically lifeless under a particularly lame duck presidency, and motivated by transparently November-driven calculations. But even if the proposed changes are doomed from the start, they push public discourse on a couple of issues that are red meat for the democrats. The stated reforms are superficially simple ones: 1) to “clarify” that “there is no immunity for crimes a former president committed while in office,” 2) to limit SCOTUS appointments to 18-year terms, and 3) to create a mandatory/enforceable ethics code on the high court. Some context for this agenda is in order. The “clarification” push flows directly, albeit inaccurately, from the recent immunity decision in Trump v. United States….

Read More about Supremely Improbable

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

July 5, 2024

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

By: James Trusty

The immediate and eventual impact of the Supreme Court’s immunity decision in Trump v. United States is both considerable and dramatically misrepresented. The initial consequences include likely delay to the January 6 prosecution out of D.C. and the setting of hearings—in D.C., Georgia and south Florida—where the judges will be required to make  factual findings as to whether the evidence supporting the indictments reflect “official…

Read More about Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

June 3, 2024

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

By: James Trusty

Federal judges are required to balance a number of factors whenever imposing sentence, including specifically enumerated areas that largely stem from the broader philosophical categories of General Deterrence, Specific Deterrence, Retribution/Punishment, Restitution and Victim Impact, and Rehabilitation. In determining the presumptively reasonable range of potential sentences, federal practitioners consult their always-handy U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which create a sentencing range grid based upon the offense characteristics…

Read More about The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

Executive’s Internet Searches Give SEC the Road Map to Make an Arrest

August 17, 2012

Executive’s Internet Searches Give SEC the Road Map to Make an Arrest

By: Ifrah Law

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has charged an executive at Bristol-Myers Squibb with insider trading, citing his Internet searches as support that he tried to cover up his illegal acts. As a high-level executive in the treasury department at Bristol-Myers Squibb, Robert D. Ramnarine helped the company target, evaluate, and acquire other pharmaceutical companies. The SEC’s complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in New…

Read More about Executive’s Internet Searches Give SEC the Road Map to Make an Arrest

Judge Clamps Down on DOJ Efforts to Apply U.S. Law Abroad

August 6, 2012

Judge Clamps Down on DOJ Efforts to Apply U.S. Law Abroad

By: Ifrah Law

The U.S. Department of Justice’s recent boasts about rigorous enforcement of the securities laws ran into a significant obstacle this month when a federal judge in Washington, D.C., dismissed part of a $50 million securities fraud case and accused DOJ prosecutors of overreaching. In an increasingly global economy, the case is a good measure of the limits on the ability of the United States government…

Read More about Judge Clamps Down on DOJ Efforts to Apply U.S. Law Abroad

Department of Justice Enters Historic Agreement with PokerStars, Full Tilt Poker

July 31, 2012

Department of Justice Enters Historic Agreement with PokerStars, Full Tilt Poker

By: Jeff Ifrah

Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars, and the U.S. Department of Justice announced today that PokerStars will acquire Full Tilt Poker’s assets in a transaction that ends the DOJ’s civil forfeiture case against Full Tilt.  Both Full Tilt and PokerStars ran online poker sites in the U.S., and in 2011 the DOJ charged both of them with violating U.S. anti-gambling laws. Jeff Ifrah, founding partner of Ifrah…

Read More about Department of Justice Enters Historic Agreement with PokerStars, Full Tilt Poker

After Legislature Acts, Delaware Ready to Become 2nd State to Legalize Online Gaming

June 29, 2012

After Legislature Acts, Delaware Ready to Become 2nd State to Legalize Online Gaming

By: Ifrah Law

Delaware is now poised to become the second state to legalize online gaming. On Wednesday, that state’s Senate passed a bill that would legalize web table games, including poker, video lottery games, and traditional lottery games to be offered online. Democratic Governor Jack Markell supports the bill and is expected to sign it into law soon. Earlier in the month the bill passed the state’s…

Read More about After Legislature Acts, Delaware Ready to Become 2nd State to Legalize Online Gaming

Appellate Court Casts Doubt on Acceptability of ‘Obey-the Law’ Injunctions

June 25, 2012

Appellate Court Casts Doubt on Acceptability of ‘Obey-the Law’ Injunctions

By: Jeff Ifrah

We recently blogged about the recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Goble, 2012 WL 1918819 (11th Cir. May 29, 2012).  There, we discussed the appeals court’s limitation on the reach of the concept of “securities fraud” under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b(5). Another aspect of that case is also…

Read More about Appellate Court Casts Doubt on Acceptability of ‘Obey-the Law’ Injunctions

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Supremely Improbable

Supremely Improbable
By: James Trusty

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury
By: James Trusty

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights