Facade of the United States Suprement Court in Washington, DC

Supremely Improbable

Supremely Improbable

July 30, 2024

Supremely Improbable

By: James Trusty

President Biden’s pronounced objectives for Supreme Court “reform” are improbable, politically lifeless under a particularly lame duck presidency, and motivated by transparently November-driven calculations. But even if the proposed changes are doomed from the start, they push public discourse on a couple of issues that are red meat for the democrats. The stated reforms are superficially simple ones: 1) to “clarify” that “there is no immunity for crimes a former president committed while in office,” 2) to limit SCOTUS appointments to 18-year terms, and 3) to create a mandatory/enforceable ethics code on the high court. Some context for this agenda is in order. The “clarification” push flows directly, albeit inaccurately, from the recent immunity decision in Trump v. United States….

Read More about Supremely Improbable

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

July 5, 2024

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

By: James Trusty

The immediate and eventual impact of the Supreme Court’s immunity decision in Trump v. United States is both considerable and dramatically misrepresented. The initial consequences include likely delay to the January 6 prosecution out of D.C. and the setting of hearings—in D.C., Georgia and south Florida—where the judges will be required to make  factual findings as to whether the evidence supporting the indictments reflect “official…

Read More about Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

June 3, 2024

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

By: James Trusty

Federal judges are required to balance a number of factors whenever imposing sentence, including specifically enumerated areas that largely stem from the broader philosophical categories of General Deterrence, Specific Deterrence, Retribution/Punishment, Restitution and Victim Impact, and Rehabilitation. In determining the presumptively reasonable range of potential sentences, federal practitioners consult their always-handy U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which create a sentencing range grid based upon the offense characteristics…

Read More about The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

DOJ Should Not Withhold Information From Defense in High-Profile Leak Case

November 5, 2012

DOJ Should Not Withhold Information From Defense in High-Profile Leak Case

By: Ifrah Law

Lawyers for Stephen Jin-Woo Kim, a former federal contractor employee accused of unlawfully disclosing sensitive information, recently filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia criticizing the government’s withholding of information in the case and asking the court to order the government to produce the documents. The government should not be permitted to withhold this type of valuable, discoverable information…

Read More about DOJ Should Not Withhold Information From Defense in High-Profile Leak Case

Judge Rakoff and the Emperor’s New Clothes

October 29, 2012

Judge Rakoff and the Emperor’s New Clothes

By: Ifrah Law

On October 24, 2012, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff sentenced Rajat Gupta to 24 months after he was found guilty by a jury of one count of conspiracy and three counts of substantive securities fraud, in connection with providing material non-public information to convicted inside trader Raj Rajratnam. This two-year prison sentence was substantially below the applicable advisory range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines…

Read More about Judge Rakoff and the Emperor’s New Clothes

Reid-Kyl Bill Would Legalize Online Poker at Federal Level

October 24, 2012

Reid-Kyl Bill Would Legalize Online Poker at Federal Level

By: Ifrah Law

A draft of the online poker bill that Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) plan to introduce was released this week. The bill, known as the “Internet Gambling Prohibition, Poker Consumer Protection, and Strengthening UIGEA Act of 2012” would legalize online poker at the federal level, a step that became possible last December when the U.S. Department of Justice released an opinion…

Read More about Reid-Kyl Bill Would Legalize Online Poker at Federal Level

DOJ Opinion on Key FCPA Issue Makes Sense, But What’s Next?

October 17, 2012

DOJ Opinion on Key FCPA Issue Makes Sense, But What’s Next?

By: Ifrah Law

We have previously advocated for the Department of Justice to employ a more narrow reading of the term “foreign official” in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Therefore, we were pleased to see that the DOJ recently issued an opinion that parsed the definition and came to the conclusion that a member of a foreign royal family was not a “foreign official” under the FCPA. Although…

Read More about DOJ Opinion on Key FCPA Issue Makes Sense, But What’s Next?

Libya Loses Court Battle Over Its Own ‘Libyan Embassy’ Trademark

September 19, 2012

Libya Loses Court Battle Over Its Own ‘Libyan Embassy’ Trademark

By: Ifrah Law

In an interesting recent opinion, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia rebuffed the Libyan Government’s bid to obtain a transfer to it of the domain name registration for libyanembassy.com from a “legalization expeditor” – a company that certifies documents as one step in the process of international legalization of documents (such as foreign birth certificates). The Libyan Government brought an action under…

Read More about Libya Loses Court Battle Over Its Own ‘Libyan Embassy’ Trademark

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Supremely Improbable

Supremely Improbable
By: James Trusty

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury
By: James Trusty

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights