Facade of the United States Suprement Court in Washington, DC

Supremely Improbable

Supremely Improbable

July 30, 2024

Supremely Improbable

By: James Trusty

President Biden’s pronounced objectives for Supreme Court “reform” are improbable, politically lifeless under a particularly lame duck presidency, and motivated by transparently November-driven calculations. But even if the proposed changes are doomed from the start, they push public discourse on a couple of issues that are red meat for the democrats. The stated reforms are superficially simple ones: 1) to “clarify” that “there is no immunity for crimes a former president committed while in office,” 2) to limit SCOTUS appointments to 18-year terms, and 3) to create a mandatory/enforceable ethics code on the high court. Some context for this agenda is in order. The “clarification” push flows directly, albeit inaccurately, from the recent immunity decision in Trump v. United States….

Read More about Supremely Improbable

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

July 5, 2024

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

By: James Trusty

The immediate and eventual impact of the Supreme Court’s immunity decision in Trump v. United States is both considerable and dramatically misrepresented. The initial consequences include likely delay to the January 6 prosecution out of D.C. and the setting of hearings—in D.C., Georgia and south Florida—where the judges will be required to make  factual findings as to whether the evidence supporting the indictments reflect “official…

Read More about Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

June 3, 2024

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

By: James Trusty

Federal judges are required to balance a number of factors whenever imposing sentence, including specifically enumerated areas that largely stem from the broader philosophical categories of General Deterrence, Specific Deterrence, Retribution/Punishment, Restitution and Victim Impact, and Rehabilitation. In determining the presumptively reasonable range of potential sentences, federal practitioners consult their always-handy U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which create a sentencing range grid based upon the offense characteristics…

Read More about The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

Va. Court Declines to Decide Status of Poker Under State’s Gambling Law

March 4, 2013

Va. Court Declines to Decide Status of Poker Under State’s Gambling Law

By: Ifrah Law

On February 28, 2013, the Virginia Supreme Court issued an opinion in which it declined to address the legality of playing poker in the state but left open the possibility for the issue to be decided in a future case. The full opinion in the case, Daniels v. Mobley, is available here. Charles Daniels, a former poker hall operator who operated charitable bingo halls in…

Read More about Va. Court Declines to Decide Status of Poker Under State’s Gambling Law

This Gaming Case Didn’t Have to Be Prosecuted

February 26, 2013

This Gaming Case Didn’t Have to Be Prosecuted

By: Ifrah Law

A Nevada man now has a criminal record – simply because he placed a bet in a casino in Las Vegas and a casino employee didn’t ask him enough questions. Robert Walker recently pleaded guilty in federal court to one misdemeanor count involving a record-keeping violation and was sentenced to one year of unsupervised probation. He was also ordered to pay a $250 fine and…

Read More about This Gaming Case Didn’t Have to Be Prosecuted

Does ‘Speech or Debate’ Trump the Right to Defend Oneself in Court?

February 20, 2013

Does ‘Speech or Debate’ Trump the Right to Defend Oneself in Court?

By: Jeffrey Hamlin

On February 5, 2013, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives filed a brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to hold that U.S. legislators and their aides cannot be forced to testify about their legislative activities, even when their expected testimony might help exonerate a criminal defendant. The case raises interesting questions about the balancing of…

Read More about Does ‘Speech or Debate’ Trump the Right to Defend Oneself in Court?

Domain Name Seizure – It’s Not Just a U.S. Law Enforcement Tactic

February 12, 2013

Domain Name Seizure – It’s Not Just a U.S. Law Enforcement Tactic

By: Ifrah Law

We have previously reported in this space about the use of domain name seizures by American law enforcement – for example, here and here.  Recent media reports show that domain name seizure has become the go-to tactic for law enforcement for other countries as well. Canadian police made a series of arrests during an invitation-only Super Bowl party attended by 2300 people as part of…

Read More about Domain Name Seizure – It’s Not Just a U.S. Law Enforcement Tactic

Court Finds State Ban on Sex Offenders’ Use of Social Media Tramples Speech Rights

January 25, 2013

Court Finds State Ban on Sex Offenders’ Use of Social Media Tramples Speech Rights

By: Steven Eichorn

In a January 23, 2013, ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit held that an Indiana law that prohibited most registered sex offenders from using social media websites was unconstitutional because it was “not narrowly tailored to protect the state’s interest.” The decision was restricted to the Indiana statute on sex offenders and did not extend its reasoning to another, related issue…

Read More about Court Finds State Ban on Sex Offenders’ Use of Social Media Tramples Speech Rights

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Supremely Improbable

Supremely Improbable
By: James Trusty

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury
By: James Trusty

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights