Excited mature businessman wearing a VR headset and experiencing virtual reality in his office

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

January 7, 2025

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

By: James Trusty

A Florida Judge may have unwittingly ushered in a new age of criminal justice, where slickly made virtual reality (“VR”) presentations turn judges and jurors into witnesses, and VR headsets provide subjective “testimony” in a powerful and difficult to challenge manner. Broward County Judge Andrew Siegel agreed to don a virtual reality headset in a preliminary proceeding[1] where the defendant was accused of aggravated assault. Miguel Albisu, the defendant, was accused of waving a gun at wedding guests and he claims self-defense. The defense hired an artist to create a “defendant’s perspective,” and the result is a historical first—the judge took in a defense expert’s testimony about self-defense that included a guided tour of the reality contained on a VR…

Read More about Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

December 6, 2024

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

By: James Trusty

As the presiding judge scolded Hunter Biden’s attorneys this week, “The Constitution provides the President with broad authority to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1, but nowhere does the Constitution give the President the authority to rewrite history.”[1]  But what exactly is that history he claims is being re-written? Judge Scarsi was challenging…

Read More about How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

Supremely Improbable

July 30, 2024

Supremely Improbable

By: James Trusty

President Biden’s pronounced objectives for Supreme Court “reform” are improbable, politically lifeless under a particularly lame duck presidency, and motivated by transparently November-driven calculations. But even if the proposed changes are doomed from the start, they push public discourse on a couple of issues that are red meat for the democrats. The stated reforms are superficially simple ones: 1) to “clarify” that “there is no…

Read More about Supremely Improbable

Conspirators Get Prison Time for Defrauding Small Business 8(a) Program

July 22, 2013

Conspirators Get Prison Time for Defrauding Small Business 8(a) Program

By: Jeff Ifrah

White-collar crime can involve any number of types of fraud against the government or private parties. One that isn’t usually thought about but can result in serious jail time involves conspiracies to obtain government contracts fraudulently by setting up bogus small and minority-owned businesses in order to qualify for government preferences. In the past few months in the Eastern District of Virginia, several businesspeople have…

Read More about Conspirators Get Prison Time for Defrauding Small Business 8(a) Program

Judge Declares He’s Not Potted Plant, Asserts Right to Supervise Deferred Prosecution Agreements

July 19, 2013

Judge Declares He’s Not Potted Plant, Asserts Right to Supervise Deferred Prosecution Agreements

By: Ifrah Law

A recent decision by U.S. District Judge John Gleeson in the Eastern District of New York may be the harbinger of new limits on the government’s ability to use a prosecutorial tool of which it has become very fond lately – the deferred prosecution agreement. Judge Gleeson’s assertion that a district court has a right to approve or disapprove the use of a DPA in a…

Read More about Judge Declares He’s Not Potted Plant, Asserts Right to Supervise Deferred Prosecution Agreements

High Court Clarifies Rule on Plea Discussions in Federal Criminal Cases

July 10, 2013

High Court Clarifies Rule on Plea Discussions in Federal Criminal Cases

By: Ifrah Law

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held last month in United States v. Davila that a guilty plea does not need to be automatically vacated, regardless of whether there has been prejudice to the defendant, when a magistrate judge improperly advises a defendant to plead guilty. In 2009, Anthony Davila was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States by filing false income tax…

Read More about High Court Clarifies Rule on Plea Discussions in Federal Criminal Cases

BP Employee Gains Dismissal on Obstruction of Justice Charge

July 9, 2013

BP Employee Gains Dismissal on Obstruction of Justice Charge

By: Ifrah Law

When is a committee not a committee? When it is a subcommittee. More than just a punchline, this is one of the key facts that led a U.S. district judge recently to dismiss charges against an employee of British Petroleum arising from his statements made in response to inquiries from a Congressional subcommittee regarding the BP Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. In…

Read More about BP Employee Gains Dismissal on Obstruction of Justice Charge

Andrew Auernheimer Appeals Hacking Conviction in This Internet Law Case

July 5, 2013

Andrew Auernheimer Appeals Hacking Conviction in This Internet Law Case

By: Ifrah Law

Earlier this week, attorneys for convicted computer hacker Andrew “Weev” Auernheimer filed their opening brief in their appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to have his conviction overturned. In 2010, Auernheimer’s co-defendant Daniel Spitler, who agreed to plead guilty in 2011, discovered a flaw in AT&T’s iPad user database, that he used to collect 114,000 email addresses. Auernheimer then disclosed…

Read More about Andrew Auernheimer Appeals Hacking Conviction in This Internet Law Case

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality
By: James Trusty

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power
By: James Trusty

Supremely Improbable

Supremely Improbable
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights