DOJ Plans to Intervene in N.J. Sports-Betting Case

DOJ Plans to Intervene in N.J. Sports-Betting Case

January 22, 2013

DOJ Plans to Intervene in N.J. Sports-Betting Case

By: Ifrah Law

The U.S. Department of Justice announced on January 22, 2013, that it plans to intervene in the lawsuit brought by the four major professional sports leagues and the NCAA challenging a New Jersey state law that legalized sports betting in the state.

The leagues have argued in court papers that the New Jersey law is invalid because it directly contravenes a 1992 federal law, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) that imposes a ban on sports betting unless the individual state had its own sports betting scheme in place between 1976 and 1990. New Jersey was given a one year window to put in place a sports betting scheme, but the legislature failed to act.

The DOJ has requested that it have until February 1 to respond to the two briefs that challenge the constitutionality of PASPA. The DOJ has also requested the opportunity to participate in oral argument on the constitutionality of PASPA on February 14.

A year ago, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie signed legislation allowing sports betting in New Jersey after it was approved by a 2-1 margin in a nonbinding voter referendum in November 2011.

The DOJ could have brought this lawsuit when the law was initially passed, but chose not to. Instead, the case was brought by the four major professional sports leagues and the NCAA. New Jersey has argued that the leagues lacked standing to bring the suit. However, last month, after briefs were filed an oral arguments were held, a district court judge in New Jersey ruled that the leagues do have standing to bring the suit.

When PASPA was being debated in Congress, the DOJ sent a letter to then Senator Joseph Biden (D-Del.), then the Judiciary Committee chairman, discussing the views of the DOJ on PASPA. The letter noted that determinations of how to raise revenue are typically left to the states and since PASPA was seeking to regulate how states generate revenue “it raises federalism issues.”

A successful outcome for New Jersey in this case would allow for other states to pursue legalized sports betting. We support New Jersey’s efforts to legalize sports betting and generate needed revenue and jobs for the state.

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law is a passionate team of experts that understands the importance of listening to and addressing specific concerns of clients – when facing the heat of a federal investigation or the ire of a business competitor. Experience in complex cases related to online gambling and sports betting, internet marking and advertising, and white collar litigation.

Related Practice(s)
Other Sports Posts
Arizona Provides Ancillary Suppliers with New Short Form Application
Ifrah on iGaming |
Aug 24, 2021

Arizona Provides Ancillary Suppliers with New Short Form Application

By: Sara Dalsheim
How does a Supplier Register to Participate in CT iGaming and Sports Betting?
Ifrah on iGaming |
Jul 15, 2021

How does a Supplier Register to Participate in CT iGaming and Sports Betting?

By: Sara Dalsheim
Did the Supreme Court Just Clear the Way for Student Athletes to Promote Sports Betting?
Ifrah on iGaming |
Jun 24, 2021

Did the Supreme Court Just Clear the Way for Student Athletes to Promote Sports Betting?

By: Sara Dalsheim
NJ Gaming Chief: “It’s a Wonderful World to Be an iGaming Operator”
Ifrah on iGaming |
Jun 11, 2021

NJ Gaming Chief: “It’s a Wonderful World to Be an iGaming Operator”

By: Jacob Grubman

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights