FTC Cracks Down on Merchants’ Empty Promises

FTC Cracks Down on Merchants’ Empty Promises

March 3, 2011

FTC Cracks Down on Merchants’ Empty Promises

By: Ifrah Law

On March 2, 2011, the Federal Trade Commission announced “Operation Empty Promises,” a multi-agency law enforcement initiative aimed at cracking down on misleading “work from home” and other business opportunity offers. The campaign includes more than 90 actions brought by various state and federal agencies in the past year, including the Department of Justice, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and state law enforcement agencies. It includes three new FTC cases and developments in seven other FTC cases.

In a press conference that was webcast by the FTC, David Vladeck, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, gave details about the new cases, including one against Ivy Capital Inc. and 29 co-defendants. The defendants in that case allegedly took more than $40 million from people who paid thousands of dollars, believing the company would help them develop their own Internet businesses and earn up to $10,000 per month. Consumers paid up to $20,000 for a business coaching program, but the FTC alleges that the products and services that the consumers received were useless. On February 22 the agency obtained an order that temporarily halted Ivy Capital’s unlawful practices, froze assets and appointed a receiver to take control of the corporate defendants.

The announcement of “Operation Empty Promises” demonstrates the FTC’s continued focus on cases in which the target consumers are particularly vulnerable, in this case because they are unemployed or otherwise in financial hardship. Other recent examples of this focus on the most vulnerable consumers include FTC cases on credit repair, foreclosure prevention, and grant offers.

Today’s announcement serves both to educate consumers about the risks of “too good to be true” offers, and to alert Internet marketers as to the types of offers that the FTC is especially skeptical about. Internet marketers should make every effort to comply with the FTC’s advertising guidelines, especially in light of this announcement. The FTC will take the view that it has placed merchants and advertisers on notice of the rules, and it can be expected to aggressively enforce any violations of those rules.

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law is a passionate team of experts that understands the importance of listening to and addressing specific concerns of clients – when facing the heat of a federal investigation or the ire of a business competitor. Experience in complex cases related to online gambling and sports betting, internet marking and advertising, and white collar litigation.

Related Practice(s)
Other Posts
POM Loses a Round in Its Advertising Dispute With FTC, But Battle Continues
FTC Beat |
Oct 11, 2012

POM Loses a Round in Its Advertising Dispute With FTC, But Battle Continues

By: Nicole Kardell
‘Results Will Vary,’ But FTC’s Cases Against Weight-Loss Companies Remain the Same
FTC Beat |
Oct 4, 2012

‘Results Will Vary,’ But FTC’s Cases Against Weight-Loss Companies Remain the Same

By: Ifrah Law
‘Get-Rich-Quick’ Systems Penalized by FTC to Tune of $478 Million
FTC Beat |
Sep 24, 2012

‘Get-Rich-Quick’ Systems Penalized by FTC to Tune of $478 Million

By: Ifrah Law
With $22.5 Million Google Settlement, FTC Sends a Clear Message
FTC Beat |
Aug 20, 2012

With $22.5 Million Google Settlement, FTC Sends a Clear Message

By: Michelle Cohen

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights