iStock_000033575872Small

Capital One Gets an Unwanted Wake Up Call

Capital One Gets an Unwanted Wake Up Call

August 8, 2014

Capital One Gets an Unwanted Wake Up Call

By: Ifrah Law

In what could become the largest ever settlement in a case brought in the 22 year history of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), Capital One and three collection agencies agreed to pay over $75 million into a settlement fund to settle a consolidated class action lawsuit alleging that the companies used an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) or prerecorded voices to call more than 21 million consumers’ cell phones without their consent. 

Although the settlement covers several different lawsuits that were consolidated, the allegations in those suits are largely the same.  The plaintiffs alleged that Capital One and the other defendants violated the TCPA by using an ATDS or prerecorded voices to call the plaintiffs about debt collection.  Debt collection calls are treated differently than other telemarketing calls under the TCPA, but still require a prior express consent from the consumer.  The plaintiffs alleged that no consent was ever obtained by the defendants. 

Capital One and the three collection agencies are not admitting any liability in the litigation. The settlement agreement also requires the defendants to conform their telemarketing practices and procedures to comply with the TCPA.  Capital One has already developed and implemented changes to its calling systems designed to prevent future violations of the TCPA.

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois offered its preliminary approval of the settlement last week and it must still be given final approval.  The final approval hearing is scheduled for December 2, 2014.  Opposition to the settlement terms and size could emerge in the meantime.

This settlement is a valuable reminder of the expensive consequences that can occur if a company’s marketing practices are not closely monitored for compliance with applicable laws.  TCPA litigation has been increasing significantly in the past few years.  Settlements like the one in this case will further encourage plaintiff’s attorneys to bring additional cases.  All companies should review their calling campaigns – whether telemarketing, appointment setting, customer service, debt collection, or otherwise to ensure RCPA compliance.  With more and more consumers opting to rely on mobile phone over residential lines, it is increasingly important to obtain prior consent for autodialed or prerecorded calls to mobile lines.   

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law is a passionate team of experts that understands the importance of listening to and addressing specific concerns of clients – when facing the heat of a federal investigation or the ire of a business competitor. Experience in complex cases related to online gambling and sports betting, internet marking and advertising, and white collar litigation.

Related Practice(s)
Other Posts
Parameters of CDA Immunity Being Tested by Appeals Court in Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment
Dec 16, 2013

Parameters of CDA Immunity Being Tested by Appeals Court in Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment

By: Ifrah Law
New Job? Think Twice Before Announcing it via Social Media
Nov 7, 2013

New Job? Think Twice Before Announcing it via Social Media

By: Ifrah Law
LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer Case over Misleading Advertising Heads to Trial – When is “Free” Really “Free”?
Oct 25, 2013

LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer Case over Misleading Advertising Heads to Trial – When is “Free” Really “Free”?

By: Ifrah Law
After Google Action, Those Who Dig for Dirt Must Dig a Little Harder
Oct 14, 2013

After Google Action, Those Who Dig for Dirt Must Dig a Little Harder

By: Jeffrey Hamlin

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights