More Enron Fallout: Skilling and DOJ Enter Agreement to Reduce Sentence

More Enron Fallout: Skilling and DOJ Enter Agreement to Reduce Sentence

May 9, 2013

More Enron Fallout: Skilling and DOJ Enter Agreement to Reduce Sentence

By: Jeffrey Hamlin

Former Enron executive Jeffrey Skilling reportedly has negotiated a deal with federal prosecutors that is likely to result in a significant reduction of the prison sentence he will serve for his role in the collapse of Enron. Under the new agreement, Skilling faces between 14 and 17.5 years in prison — a 27 to 42 percent reduction relative to his previous sentence of 24 years. Apparently, Skilling’s aggressive defense wore prosecutors down in such a way that they are now willing to give up almost half of Skilling’s prison sentence to resolve the case once and for all.

In May 2006, Skilling was convicted on one count of conspiracy, 12 counts of securities fraud, five counts of making false statements to auditors, and one count of insider trading. As a result, he was sentenced to roughly 24 years in prison and ordered to pay $45 million in restitution.

Skilling appealed the convictions and sentence with some success. First, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit vacated his sentence on the grounds that the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines had been misapplied. Then, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the trial record did not support his conviction for conspiracy to commit “honest services” wire fraud. On remand, the 5th Circuit found the “honest services” error to be harmless and upheld the conviction so all that remained was for Skilling to be resentenced.

Skilling’s attorneys were preparing to request a second trial based on newly discovered evidence, but the prosecutors evidently decided that the fight was not worth it. According to prosecutors, the government has invested extraordinary resources in bringing Skilling to justice, and a second round would impose even greater costs, delay resolution, and delay restitution payments to Skilling’s victims.

The parties’ agreement will facilitate closure by stipulating that a sentence in the range of 14 to 17.5 years is reasonable. Both parties have agreed not to contest a sentence within that range and have reserved their right to contest a sentence outside that range.

U.S. District Judge Sim Lake, the sentencing judge, is likely to agree with the parties, as a sentence outside the agreed-upon range would burden the parties with costs they would rather avoid.

Skilling is scheduled to be resentenced in the Southern District of Texas on June 21.

Jeffrey Hamlin

Jeffrey Hamlin

A litigator who has handled cases in environmental law, civil rights, and legal ethics, Jeff Hamlin's practice focus at Ifrah Law is on white collar defense, FTC litigation, government contracts, health care litigation and online gaming.

Related Practice(s)
Other Posts
Was This Sentence Quite Excessive for a Bizarre Fraud Scheme?
White-Collar Crimes |
Aug 15, 2013

Was This Sentence Quite Excessive for a Bizarre Fraud Scheme?

By: Ifrah Law
Conspirators Get Prison Time for Defrauding Small Business 8(a) Program
White-Collar Crimes |
Jul 22, 2013

Conspirators Get Prison Time for Defrauding Small Business 8(a) Program

By: Jeff Ifrah
Judge Declares He’s Not Potted Plant, Asserts Right to Supervise Deferred Prosecution Agreements
White-Collar Crimes |
Jul 19, 2013

Judge Declares He’s Not Potted Plant, Asserts Right to Supervise Deferred Prosecution Agreements

By: Ifrah Law
Kansas Juror Found in Contempt for Online Comments During Trial
White-Collar Crimes |
Jun 10, 2013

Kansas Juror Found in Contempt for Online Comments During Trial

By: Jeffrey Hamlin

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights